Will McAvoy Handle

Why the Will McAvoy Twitter Handle is Awesome

If you’ve never watched an episode of The Newsroom, you should. If your ideals are more progressive, you’ll find it affirming and inspiring. Even if they’re not, the issues raised in the story will make you think. Even if you don’t want to think, the cast is stellar and Aaron Sorkin’s writing is hard to hate. Just do yourself a favor, and give it a couple episodes.

But regardless, you should follow Will McAvoy on Twitter. In the show, Will McAvoy is the main character – a media stalwart who “goes off the reservation” by refusing to play it safe in his reporting at the encouragement of an old love and colleague. On Twitter, he’s a damn force of nature. He nearly religiously engages in debates with the Twitterverse on important political and social issues, blending snark, facts and argument in a seamless tapestry of awesome. His patience with those who never really wanted to engage to begin with is monumental.

I’ll just point out one example, so you’ve got an idea of what I’m talking about:

Will McAvoy Twitter Debate

Click to enlarge.

So what? You might say. So he picks a fight with a few trolls on Twitter. What does it matter?

That might be a fair observation. Frankly, if you follow him, and you really pay attention to some of the exchanges taking place, it’s hard to deny that the odds of him convincing his sparring partners that they are even 1% incorrect are probably slim to none. But that’s not why the debates are important. What’s important is how he impacts spectators: skeptics and advocates alike.

Maybe he can’t change the minds of those who are set in their ways, but there are others following him, his followers, and his debate partners that are probably not as set in their ways. When McAvoy engages in the debates in a reasonable manner that is measured and respectful (most of the time – when he snaps, it’s with good reason), he DOES have the chance to influence the beliefs of those watching the debate unfold. That doesn’t mean he changes their minds necessarily, and he doesn’t need to do so. All he needs to do is make them start asking questions. Change is a slow process, but conversations like the ones McAvoy participates in can serve as a catalyst in moving that process forward.

He also presents an excellent model of engagement for advocates on the issues. When you’re passionate about something, it can become all consuming. It gets difficult to engage with people who may seem irrational or who refuse to participate in the conversation to a productive end. But it’s important to have those conversations anywayWhen you engage rationally and respectfully (again, where merited), you have a better chance of having your message heard, both by the intended recipient and those watching on the sidelines. McAvoy is uniquely skilled in this capacity, and we could all do with taking a page out of his playbook.

It’s sort of unsettling to have such admiration for a fictional character in social media. But fiction, at its best, pushes us to be more than we are. To this end, bravo, Mr. McAvoy. Bravo.

Advertisements

6 comments

  1. Definitely going to follow this one! You make a really good point about debates. I had a post about marriage equality freshly pressed last week, and while I didn’t get too many negative responses, I tried to engage the ones I did get in a respectful way. You can’t win them all. In fact, I didn’t win most of them just because trolls don’t want to change their mind. But when friends and other readers started telling me how well they thought I made my case and engaged the trolls, I realized its not really about the trolls at all.

    Thanks for sharing this Twitter account!

  2. Wonderful post. I agree that McAvoy’s Twitter is a great example of how to debate. The point of debating is to convince the audience, not the opponent. This is both the strength and weakness of debating. It lets you contrast your thoughts and ideas against what someone on the “other side” is saying. It’s also prey to some of the basic logical fallacies, like appeals to emotion, appeals to authority and ad-homin attacks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s